Ocean Tomo, LLC v. Jonathan Barney
| Ocean Tomo, LLC |
| Jonathan Barney and PatentRatings, LLC |
| PatentRatings, LLC and Jonathan Barney |
| Ocean Tomo, LLC |
| 1:2012cv08450 |
| October 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Joan B. Gottschall |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
547
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court finds that a decrease of Barney's requested fees is appropriate. Because the parties' numbers are relatively close when compared to the total fees expended in this case, the Court finds that the best way to end this dispute once and for all is to split the difference: Barney is awarded $137,849.90 for filing the fee petition, inclusive of costs and interest. Barney's motion for fees 541 is granted to that extent. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 7/27/2022. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing
539
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendants' motion to amend 460 is denied in part and granted in part in accordance with this order; Defendants' motion for costs 463 is denied; and Barney's motion for fees and costs pursuant to the O perating Agreement 510 is granted to the extent that the Court awards Barney $840,156.71 in fees, $37,778.47 in costs, and $157,549.86 in interest, for a total of $1,035,485.04. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 7/27/2021. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing
458
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Barney may seek attorney's fees pursuant to section 13.18 of the operating agreement. Any bill of costs and/or motion for attorney's fees should be filed in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54. Any bill of costs should include argument as to why the party should be considered a prevailing party. The Court clarifies its findings of fact and conclusions of law 440 to the extent set forth in this opinion and order. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/11/2019:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
|
Filing
294
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, Ocean Tomo's motion for summary judgement, R. 238 , is denied with respect to Counts I and III. Ocean Tomo's motion also is denied with respect to Count VI as it pertains to the seco nd, third, fourth, and fifth alleged misrepresentations in paragraph 40 of Defendants' Second Amended Counter-Claim. Ocean Tomo's motion is granted with respect to Count VI as it pertains to the first alleged misrepresentation in paragraph 40 of Defendants' Second Amended Counter-Claim. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 6/14/2017:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
|
Filing
147
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 9/24/2015. Mailed notice(mjc, )
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 6/12/2014. Mailed notice(ef, )
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 9/9/2013: Mailed notice(tlp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
