Miksis et al v. Evanston Township High School District 202
Michael Miksis, Christine Miksis and John Miksis |
Evanston Township High School District 202 |
1:2012cv08497 |
October 23, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Ronald A. Guzman |
Civil Rights: Other |
20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on January 31, 2017, 86 , is stricken and replaced with the attached Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order. Status hearing set for 2/15/2017 at 09:00 AM. All other status dates are vacated. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 2/2/2017:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Filing 86 AMENDED MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 1/31/2017:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Filing 85 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: In accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the attached memorandum opinion and order, and as previously ordered, R. 81 , Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, R. 49 , and Defendant's cross- motion for summary judgment, R, 51 , are denied. A status hearing is set for 2/21/2017 at 09:00 AM. Neither party has made a jury demand, so the parties should be prepared to discuss at the status an appropriate date for a bench trial. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 1/27/2017:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.