Great Northern Insurance Company, et al v. Cellar Advisors, LLC
| Great Northern Insurance Company |
| Cellar Advisors, LLC |
| 1:2012cv09343 |
| November 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| James B. Zagel |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
206
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, Flagship's Motion for New Trial 180 and Motion for Remittitur 181 are both denied. Ruling set for 9/13/16 is stricken and no appearance is necessary. Signed by the Honorable James B. Zagel on 8/18/2016. Mailed notice(ep, )
|
|
Filing
160
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, CA's Rule 26(a)(2) disclosure (Exhibit 24) is admissible into evidence as an admission by a party opponent. Although Exhibit 24 is admissible, CA is not bound to it, a point that I have already made clear when I ruled on Flagship's motion for summary judgment. See Order for further details. Signed by the Honorable James B. Zagel on 3/14/2016. Mailed notice(ep, )
|
|
Filing
131
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable James B. Zagel on 5/6/2015. Mailed notice(ep, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
