Bank of America, National Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
| Bank of America, National Association |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2012cv09612 |
| December 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| John Z. Lee |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
245
ORDER: Before the Court is Bank of America's second motion to compel responses to Subpoena Duces Tecum and Subpoenas Ad Testificandum by non-party Spring Hill Capital Partners, LLC [dkts. 193 and 204]. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies this motion. [For further details see order.] - Signed by the Honorable Susan E. Cox on 1/15/2015. Mailed notice (np, )
|
|
Filing
160
ORDER: Before the Court is Bank of America's motion to compel responses to Subpoena Duces Tecum and Subpoenas Ad Testificandum by non-party Spring Hill Capital Partners, LLC (dkts. 113 and 121 ). The Court finds the theories advanced by Bank of America to enforce these subpoenas are not persuasive and, therefore, sustains the objections to them by Spring Hill. Bank of America's motion is hereby denied. Signed by the Honorable Susan E. Cox on 8/12/2014. Mailed notice (np, )
|
|
Filing
151
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 7/23/14Mailed notice(ca, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
