Porter et al v. Pipefitters Association et al
Duane Porter, Kenneth Black, Ronald Bouie, Ricky Brown, Samuel Clark, Frank Craddieth, Donald Gayles and Steve Wilson |
Pipefitters Association Local Union 597 and Mechanical Contractors Association of Chicago |
1:2012cv09844 |
December 10, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
John W. Darrah |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 159 OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion and Order, the Court grants Local 597's motion for summary judgment 139 with regard to Plaintiffs' Title VII disparate impact claims, two of their LMRA claims (regardin g Local 597's enforcement of contractor compliance with the Referral Hall policy and Local 597's grievance policy), and their retaliation claims. The Court denies the motion with regard to Plaintiffs' Title VII intentional discriminat ion claims, § 1981 claim, and one of their LMRA claims (regarding the creation of the Referral Hall policy). Additionally, the Court denies Local 597's motion to strike 145 . Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 7/25/2018. Mailed notice(rj, ) |
Filing 109 OPINION and Order Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 9/20/2016. Mailed notice (eaa, ) |
Filing 54 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order, Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 9/12/2013. (ea, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.