Nalco Company v. Chen
Plaintiff: Nalco Company
Defendant: David T. Chen
Counter_claimant: David T. Chen
Counter_defendant: Nalco Company, and Nalco Mobotec, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv09931
Filed: December 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Du Page
Presiding Judge: Harry D. Leinenweber
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 228 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 2/2/2018. Mailed notice (cc, )
June 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 152 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 6/10/2016:Mailed notice(wp, )
October 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 127 MOTION by Plaintiff Nalco Company for judgment - leave to execute (Jaffe, Lauren)
May 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 120 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 5/27/2015:Mailed notice(wp, )
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 61 Memorandum Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 6/4/2014:Civil case terminated.Mailed notice(wp, )
August 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 8/22/2013:Mailed notice(wp, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nalco Company v. Chen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nalco Company
Represented By: Michael R. Dockterman
Represented By: Bilal Zaheer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David T. Chen
Represented By: Casey Ryan Fronk
Represented By: Michael B Slade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: David T. Chen
Represented By: Casey Ryan Fronk
Represented By: Michael B Slade
Represented By: Casey Ryan Fronk
Represented By: Michael B Slade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Nalco Company,
Represented By: Michael R. Dockterman
Represented By: Bilal Zaheer
Represented By: Michael R. Dockterman
Represented By: Bilal Zaheer
Represented By: Michael R. Dockterman
Represented By: Bilal Zaheer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Nalco Mobotec, Inc.
Represented By: Michael R. Dockterman
Represented By: Bilal Zaheer
Represented By: Michael R. Dockterman
Represented By: Bilal Zaheer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?