T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. AU Electronics, Inc. et al
T-Mobile USA, Inc. |
AU Electronics, Inc., Global Mobile Trading, Inc., Adnan Vadria and Umair Yasin |
1:2012cv10046 |
December 18, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
XX US, Outside the State of IL |
Geraldine Soat Brown |
Marvin E. Aspen |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 152 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons explained above, the Court grants defendants' motion to reform the settlement agreement and reforms the language of the agreement as specified therein. 143 The Court further grants the relief req uested in T-Mobile's motion to enforce the settlement agreement and finds that defendants' notice of repudiation is without force or effect. 124 In light of the Court's enforcement of the settlement agreement, defendants' motio ns to dismiss are denied as moot. [37, 40] Simultaneously with the entry of this opinion, the Court will enter a signed stipulated order for dismissal. Defendants' motion to reclassify documents and defendants' motion for reconsideration are denied as moot. [90, 130] This case is therefore dismissed with prejudice. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 1/23/2014:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.