Wilkins v. Doe et al
| Joseph Wilkins |
| Officer Derengowski, Officer Vasquez, Ms. Bracy, Superintendent of DIV # 2, Jane Doe, Richardson and Steve |
| 1:2012cv10054 |
| May 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| John A. Nordberg |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable John A. Nordberg on 6/4/2013:The plaintiff's motions for appointment of counsel nos. 29 and 32 and motion for subpoenas # 30 are denied. [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (tg, )
|
|
Filing
10
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable John A. Nordberg on 2/11/2013:The plaintiff's renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis # 9 is granted. On the court's own motion, Supt. Hickerson, Sheriff Dart, and Cermak Health Department ar e dismissed as defendants on initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The clerk is directed to issue summonses for service on all other defendants by the U.S. Marshal. The clerk is also directed to send the plaintiff a magistrate judge c onsent form and filing instructions along with a copy of this order. The plaintiff is once again reminded that he is required to provide the court with the original plus a judge's copy of every document filed. [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (tg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
