Padilla v. NBTY, Inc. et al
| Francisco Padilla |
| NBTY, Inc., Arthritis Research Corp. and Natures Bounty, Inc. |
| 1:2012cv10211 |
| December 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Samuel Der-Yeghiayan |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan: Plaintiff having filed a notice of voluntary dismissal #4 the instant action is hereby ordered dismissed,without prejudice. All pending dates and motions, if any, are hereby stricken as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs Without Prejudice (Siprut, Joseph) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. (cft, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Francisco Padilla by Aleksandra M. S. Vold (Vold, Aleksandra) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Francisco Padilla to certify class (Siprut, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Francisco Padilla by Joseph J Siprut (Siprut, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Siprut, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Francisco Padilla; Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0752-7877017.(Siprut, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
