Chicago Teachers Union et al v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago et al
Chicago Teachers Union, Local 1 American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, Donald L Garrett, Jr., Robert Green and Vivonell Brown, Jr. |
Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Barbara Byrd-Bennett |
1:2012cv10311 |
December 26, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Matthew F. Kennelly |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 314 OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion and Order, the Court denies Plaintiffs' and the Board's motions for summary judgment 302 , 304 . Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 3/17/2021:Mailed notice(rj, ) |
Filing 289 OPINION AND ORDER. The Court denies the Board's motion to exclude Trujillo's testimony 254 . The Court also denies Plaintiffs' motion to exclude Jacob's testimony 258 . The Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiffs 039; motion to exclude Blanchflower's testimony 258 . The Court excludes Blanchflower's legal conclusions about race discrimination, his opinions regarding employee turnover, and his opinions regarding the hearing officer reports. The Co urt grants in part and denies in part the Board's motion to exclude Walker's opinions 256 . The Court excludes Walker's opinions regarding the hypothetical in Report 1, Figure 10. The Court also excludes Blanchflower's declaration, which the Board filed in support of the its motion to exclude Walker's opinions, Doc. 257-1, Exhibit 7. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 2/25/2020. Mailed notice(rj, ) |
Filing 104 Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 5/27/2014. Mailed notice(rj, ) |
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 7/2/2013: Defendants' motion to dismiss the claims of plaintiff Chicago Teachers Union for lack of jurisdiction 27 is denied for the reasons stated in the accompanying decision. (mk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.