Spears v. Washington

Spears v. Washington

Plaintiff:	Dion Spears
Defendant:	C.O. Washington
Case Number:	1:2012cv10364
Filed:	December 27, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Will
Presiding Judge:	Charles R. Norgle
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 2, 2013	Filing 5 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr on 1/2/2013:The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis # 3 is granted. The court authorizes and orders the trust fund officer at the plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $10.00 from the plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial filing fee, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. On the court's own motion, any c laim that prison officials have discriminated against the plaintiff on account of a disability is dismissed without prejudice to pursuing such a claim in a separate lawsuit. The clerk is directed to: (1) send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at the Stateville Correctional Center; (2) issue summons for service on the defendant by the U.S. Marshal; and (3) send the plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form and Instructions for Submitting Documents along with a copy of this order. The plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel # 4 is denied, withoutprejudice. [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (tg, )

Date Filed

Document Text

January 2, 2013

Filing 5 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr on 1/2/2013:The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis # 3 is granted. The court authorizes and orders the trust fund officer at the plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $10.00 from the plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial filing fee, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. On the court's own motion, any c laim that prison officials have discriminated against the plaintiff on account of a disability is dismissed without prejudice to pursuing such a claim in a separate lawsuit. The clerk is directed to: (1) send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at the Stateville Correctional Center; (2) issue summons for service on the defendant by the U.S. Marshal; and (3) send the plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form and Instructions for Submitting Documents along with a copy of this order. The plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel # 4 is denied, withoutprejudice. [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (tg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spears v. Washington
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dion Spears
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: C.O. Washington
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?