Chua et al v. Shippee et al
| David C. Chua, Wendy Yeh and David C. Chua M.D. SC Ltd. 412(i) Defined Benefits Plan Sponsor and Administrator of the David C. Chua M.D.SC Ltd. 412(i) Defined Benefits Plan |
| Bruce Ashton, Heather Bader-Abrigo, Larry Shippee, Reish & Reicher, P.C. and Martin M Heming |
| 1:2013cv00383 |
| January 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| George M. Marovich |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The Court grants defendant Shippees motion 16 to dismiss. As to Shippee, Count III is dismissed with prejudice and Counts I, II and IV are dismissed without prejudice. The Court grants the Reish defendants motion [1 2] to dismiss. Plaintiffs Chua and Chua Medicals claims against the Reish defendants are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Yehs Count III against the Reish defendants is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Yehs Counts I, II and IV against the Re ish defendants are dismissed without prejudice. Shippees motion 31 to strike is granted, and plaintiffs motion 36 to amend is denied. Plaintiffs are granted 28 days in which to file a second amended complaint, should they so choose. Signed by the Honorable George M. Marovich on 9/10/2013:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
