Murithi v. Hardy et al
| Mwenda Murithi |
| Marcus Hardy and James Louch |
| 1:2013cv00599 |
| January 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Will |
| John J. Tharp |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons explained in the Memorandum Opinion and Order, the defendants' motion for summary judgment 82 is granted. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 3/9/2016.Mailed notice(air, )
|
|
Filing
4
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 2/11/2013: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file his complaint in forma pauperis 3 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $6.50 and authorizes the t rust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of confinement to make deductions from Plaintiff's trust fund account in accordance with this order. The clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at Stateville Correctional Ce nter. Plaintiff may proceed with his complaint against Warden Marcus Hardy and James Louch, and the clerk shall issues summonses for service of the complaint on the Defendants through the U.S. Marshal. The clerk shall also send Plaintiff a Magistrate Judge consent form and instructions for filing documents in this Court. Mailed notice. (ea, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
