Dailey et al v. Cook County Illinois et al
| Eric J. Hunt and John Dailey |
| Morecis, Cook County Illinois and Michael Puisis |
| 1:2013cv00700 |
| January 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Charles P. Kocoras |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
WRITTEN OPINION by Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: The plaintiffs' respective motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docs 3 & 4 ) are granted. The court authorizes and orders Cook County Jail officials to begin making monthly deduction s from each inmate's trust fund account toward payment of the filing fee in accordance with this order. Each plaintiff must pay a separate $350.00 filing fee. The clerk shall send a copy of this order to the Supervisor of Inmate Trust Fund Accounts, Cook County Dept. of Corrections Administrative Office, Division V, 2700 S. California, Chicago, IL 60608. The clerk is directed to issue summonses for service on the defendants by the U.S. Marshal. The clerk is also directed to send the plaintiffs copies of the court's notice of availability of magistrate judge and filing instructions along with a copy of this order. (For further details see Written Opinion) Mailed notice (rp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
