Ross et al v. Hardy et al
| Nedrick Jeffrey Hardy, Sr, Eugene Ross, Joe Tucker, Ray Burgess, Anthony Whitefield, Marvin Williford, Terrence Polk, Antonio House, Christopher Jones, Calvin Compton, Leon Tanna, Andre Patterson, Marlon Curry, Eddie Adams, Reginald Kelly, Antonio McDowell, Bobby Cooks, John Burke, Kenneth Massey and Derrick Harrison |
| Salvador Godinez, Wexford Health Sources Inc., Marcus Hardy, Pat Quinn and Lemke |
| 1:2013cv01069 |
| February 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Will |
| Thomas M. Durkin |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated above, the Court grants Defendant Wexford's motion for summary judgment (R.22), and dismisses Wexford as a Defendant. The dismissal is without prejudice, and Plaintiff may refile his claim a gainst Wexford if and when he exhausts administrative remedies for the claims. This case is stayed while Plaintiff is a member of the class in Dobbey v. Weilding, No. 13 C 1068(N.D. Ill)(Dow, J.) (Order of 1/23/14 certified as class for all inmates incarcerated at Stateville after 1/1/11 who endured the same conditions alleged by Plaintiff). A status hearing is set for 6/17/14 at 8:45 a.m. to address whether Plaintiff will proceed as a member of the Dobbey class or individually with his own suit separate from the class. Wexford Health Sources Inc. terminated. Defendant is to make arrangements to have plaintiff available by telephone for the status hearing. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 5/22/2014:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
|
Filing
18
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 3/12/2013: The complaint is dismissed without prejudice to plaintiff Eugene Ross submitting an amended complaint on his own behalf or all the plaintiffs signing an amended complaint that resolves the issues stated herein and satisfies the filing fee requirement for each plaintiff. Plaintiff Ross or all plaintiffs are given 30 days from the date of this order to comply. If the Court receives no amended complaint in accordance with this order, along with resolution of the filing fee requirement, the Court will summarily dismiss this case or any noncomplying plaintiff. The Court defers ruling on the completed in forma pauperis applications until after it is clear who the plaintiffs are in this case. Any incomplete in forma pauperis application will be denied. The motions for a preliminary injunction [16}, {17] are denied. Mailed notice. [For further details see written opinion.](ea, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
