Leaks et al v. Dart et al
| Kermit Leaks and Dr. Manilla |
| Thomas Dart, John Doe, Jane Doe, Cermak Health Services, Sgt. Konick and C/O Mosquera |
| 1:2013cv01262 |
| February 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| James B. Zagel |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, Defendant's motion for summary judgment 52 is denied. Plaintiff's response to Defendant's motion for summary judgment, which is styled as a motion 64 , is stricken as a pending motion, as the Court has already denied Defendant's motion. The Court exercises its discretion to recruit counsel for Plaintiff. The Court requests that Robert John Prendergast, Daley Mohan Gr oble PC, 55 West Monroe Street, Suite 1600, Chicago, IL 60603-5001, represent Plaintiff in accordance with counsel's trial bar obligations under the District Court's Local Rule 83.37 (N.D. Ill.). The Attorney Video Conference Room is now available at both the Chicago and Rockford courthouse. The case is set for status on 5/31/16 at 9:15 a.m. See Order for further details. Signed by the Honorable James B. Zagel on 3/8/2016. Mailed notice(ep, )
|
|
Filing
8
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable James B. Zagel on 5/22/2013: The Clerk is instructed to file plaintiff's amended complaint (Dkt. No. 6). The Clerk is instructed to issue a summons for service on Defendant Dart. The Clerk shall also se nd plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form, Amended Civil Rights Complaint Form, and Instructions for Submitting Documents along with a copy of this order. The United States Marshals Service is appointed to serve Defendant Dart. Defendants Cook Cou nty Jail, Cermak Health Services, Dr. Manilla, and Sergenat Konick are dismissed. Plaintiff may only proceed against the Doe defendants in their individual capacity. Plaintiff's official capacity claims are dismissed. Sheriff Dart remains in the case solely so that plaintiff may identify the John and Jane Doe defendants. Plaintiff's motion for reconsdieration (Dkt. No. 7) of the denial of his request for attorney assistance is denied. [For further details see text below.]. Mailed notices(gcy, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
