Walker v. Ghosh et al
| David D Walker |
| Parthasarthi Ghosh and Wexford Health Resources, Inc. |
| 1:2013cv01354 |
| February 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Will |
| Virginia M. Kendall |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 3/25/2015. Mailed notice(gel, )
|
|
Filing
6
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 2/28/2013:Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis # 3 is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $52.89 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial filing fee, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the trust fund offic er at the Stateville Correctional Center. The Clerk is directed to issue summonses for service on Defendants by the U.S. Marshal. The Clerk is further directed to send Plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form and Instructions for Submitting Documents along with a copy of this order. Plaintiff's motion for attorney assistance # 4 is denied, without prejudice. [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (tg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
