Grayson v. The City of Aurora, Illinois et al
| Jonathan Grayson |
| The City of Aurora, Illinois, Aurora Police Sergeant Kearbey, Aurora Police Investigator Wallers, Aurora Police Investigator Soto, Aurora Police Investigator Kinney, Aurora Police Investigator Robertson, Aurora Police Detective West, Aurora Police Detective Thompson, Aurora Police Detective Gumz, as-yet Unknown Current or Former City of Aurora, Illinois Employees and as-yet Unknown Aurora Police Department Employees |
| 1:2013cv01705 |
| March 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Virginia M. Kendall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
255
MOTION for summary judgment 159 is granted in part and denied in part; MOTION for summary judgment 177 is granted in part and denied in part. The Court grants summary judgment in favor of the Defendants on Graysons (1) due process claim to the ex tent it relies on fabricated evidence or unduly suggestive identification procedure allegations, (2) supervisory liability claim, (3) federal and state conspiracy claims, (4) negligent supervision claim, (5) intentional infliction of emotional distre ss claim, (6) respondeat superior claim, (7) spoliation claim, and (8) conspiracy to deny access to courts claim. The Court denies summary judgment on Graysons (1) due process claim to the extent it relies on Brady violations and coerced confession allegations, (2) failure to intervene claim, (3) malicious prosecution claim, and (4) indemnification claim. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 1/17/2016:Mailed notice(Kendall, Virginia)
|
|
Filing
131
Enter ORDER: The Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count XI of the Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 80) is granted without prejudice. Graysons Opposition to the Defendants Motion to Re-Open the Deposition of Marilou Alvorado (Dkt. No. 114) is granted in part and denied in part. The Court will not reconsider its prior ruling, but will afford both parties an additional thirty minutes of deposition time with the witness. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/31/2014.Mailed notice(tsa, )
|
|
Filing
56
Enter MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: For the reasons set forth, the Court grants Graysons Motion to Compel Discovery. The Court limits this discovery to the named individual Defendants only and does not permit discovery of the personnel files, citizen complaint files, and employee complaint histories for any other individuals, unless and until those individuals are subsequently added as parties to the Complaint. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/19/2013.Mailed notice(tsa, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
