Kirley v. Board of Education of Maine Township High School District 207 et al
||Board of Education of Maine Township High School District 207 and Maine Township High School District 207
||March 5, 2013
||Illinois Northern District Court
||James F. Holderman
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Jobs
|Cause of Action:
||42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 20, 2013
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. For the reasons set forth above, District 207's "Motion to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's Complaint" (Dkt. No. 11) is granted in part and denied in part. Count II is dismissed to the e xtent Kirley alleges a claim for age discrimination; Count II remains pending with respect to Kirley's claim for retaliation under the ADEA; Count III remains pending; Kirley's request for monetary damages with respect to Count IV is strick en, but Count IV remains pending in all other respects. Count I also remains pending, and Defendants' Answer to Count I has been filed with the court. (Dkt. No. 14.) Defendants Answer to Counts II, III, and IV is due on or before 1/10/14. Co unsel are requested to meet pursuant to Rule 26(f) and jointly file a Form 52 on or before 1/17/14. This case is set for a report on status and entry of a scheduling order on 1/21/14, at 9:00 a.m. The parties are encouraged to discuss settlement. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 12/20/2013: Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.