Joseph et al v. Carnes et al
| Andrew Joseph, Isamu Fairbanks, Ian Doughty and Martin Craig |
| Lisa Carnes, Gregory Pease, Rick Jacobs and Chris Hamilton |
| 1:2013cv02279 |
| March 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| John W. Darrah |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 2518 Interception of Wire/Oral/Electronic Communication |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Plaintiffs Andrew Joseph, Isamu Fairbanks, Ian Doughty, and Martin Craig filed suit against Defendants Lisa Carnes, Gregory Pease, Rick Jacobs, and Chris Hamilton on March 26, 2013, alleging two counts: a civil cause o f action under the Stored Communications Act (the SCA), 18 U.S.C. § 2701; and civil conspiracy. The parties stipulated to dismissal of Count II, the civil conspiracy count, with prejudice. Defendants have now moved for summary judgment on Count I. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 109 is denied. Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 6/4/2015. Mailed notice. (jl)
|
|
Filing
139
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 4/30/2015. Mailed notice. (as, )
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 9/19/2013. Mailed notice (tg, )
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 5/14/2013.(jp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
