Little v. Village of Oak Park Police Department et al
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Little
Defendant:
Village of Oak Park Police Department, Officer Guy and Officer John Doe
Case Number:
1:2013cv02341
Filed:
March 28, 2013
Court:
Illinois Northern District Court
Office:
Chicago Office
County:
Jefferson
Presiding Judge:
Thomas M. Durkin
Nature of Suit:
Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:
Both
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| April 10, 2013 | 5 |
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 4/10/2013: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted. The Court authorizes and orders Stateville Correctional Center officials to deduct $7.00 from Plaintiffs account, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at the Big Muddy River Correctional Center. The Clerk shall also issue summons for servi ce of the complaint on Defendant Officer Guy and send Plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form and Instructions for Submitting Documents along with a copy of this order. Plaintiff's motion for the assistance of counsel 4 is denied without prejudice. (For further details see written opinion.) Mailed notice.(ym, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.