Edwards v. Hodge

Edwards v. Hodge

Plaintiff:	Duane Edwards
Defendant:	Marc Hodge
Case Number:	1:2013cv02469
Filed:	April 2, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Lawrence
Presiding Judge:	Ruben Castillo
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 23, 2013	Filing 4 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Ruben Castillo on 4/23/2013: Edwards' motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted. The court authorizes the trust fund officer at his place of confinement to make deductions from his tr ust fund account in accordance with this order. The clerk shall send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at Lawrence Correctional Center. The complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See 28 U .S.C. § 1915A. The dismissal of this case shall count as one of Edwards three allotted dismissals under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The court advises Plaintiff that he now has three dismissals under § 1915(g), that he cannot proceed in form a pauperis in future actions filed in federal court (except for petitions for a writ of habeas corpus relief) unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical harm, and that he must inform that he has had three § 1915(g) dismissals for any future actions filed in federal court. Mailed notice. [For further details see written opinion.](ea, )

Date Filed

Document Text

April 23, 2013

Filing 4 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Ruben Castillo on 4/23/2013: Edwards' motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted. The court authorizes the trust fund officer at his place of confinement to make deductions from his tr ust fund account in accordance with this order. The clerk shall send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at Lawrence Correctional Center. The complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See 28 U .S.C. § 1915A. The dismissal of this case shall count as one of Edwards three allotted dismissals under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The court advises Plaintiff that he now has three dismissals under § 1915(g), that he cannot proceed in form a pauperis in future actions filed in federal court (except for petitions for a writ of habeas corpus relief) unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical harm, and that he must inform that he has had three § 1915(g) dismissals for any future actions filed in federal court. Mailed notice. [For further details see written opinion.](ea, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edwards v. Hodge
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Duane Edwards
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Marc Hodge
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?