Brown v. Chicago Municipal Employees Credit Union et al
| Angela Brown |
| Chicago Municipal Employees Credit Union and City Of Chicago Comptrollers Office |
| 1:2013cv02597 |
| April 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| John J. Tharp |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Board's motion for summary judgment 62 is granted and judgment is entered for all defendants. Case terminated. Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 9/28/2015. Mailed notice(air, )
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 4/16/2014:Mailed notice(air, )
|
|
Filing
6
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 4/17/2013:For the reasons set forth in the Statement section of this Order, the plaintiff's complaint 1 is dismissed without prejudice, application to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted, and motion for appointment of counsel 4 is denied without prejudice. The plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint on or before May 17, 2013. [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (tg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
