Hicks v. Dart et al

Hicks v. Dart et al

Plaintiff:	C Demetrius Hicks, Sr.
Defendant:	John Mueller
Case Number:	1:2013cv02749
Filed:	April 11, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Brown
Presiding Judge:	Amy J. St. Eve
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 13, 2013	Filing 6 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 5/13/2013: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the Courts dismissal of Sheriff Tom Dart as a Defendant # 5 is construed as a motion to alter or amend the Court's 4/16/13 order. Plaintiff's motion is denied. Mailed notice (tlm)
April 16, 2013	Filing 4 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 4/16/2013: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis # 3 is granted. The trust fund officer at his place of confinement is authorized to deduct $9.65 from Plaintiff's t rust fund account and continue making deductions in accordance with this order. The clerk shall: mail a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at Western Illinois Correctional Center, issue summons for service of the complaint on Defendant Cook County Jail Program Director John Mueller, and send Plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form and instructions for filing documents in this Court. The United States Marshals Service is appointed to serve this Defendant John Mueller. Tom Dart is dismissed as a Defendant. Mailed notice (tlm)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 13, 2013

Filing 6 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 5/13/2013: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the Courts dismissal of Sheriff Tom Dart as a Defendant # 5 is construed as a motion to alter or amend the Court's 4/16/13 order. Plaintiff's motion is denied. Mailed notice (tlm)

April 16, 2013

Filing 4 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 4/16/2013: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis # 3 is granted. The trust fund officer at his place of confinement is authorized to deduct $9.65 from Plaintiff's t rust fund account and continue making deductions in accordance with this order. The clerk shall: mail a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at Western Illinois Correctional Center, issue summons for service of the complaint on Defendant Cook County Jail Program Director John Mueller, and send Plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form and instructions for filing documents in this Court. The United States Marshals Service is appointed to serve this Defendant John Mueller. Tom Dart is dismissed as a Defendant. Mailed notice (tlm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks v. Dart et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: John Mueller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: C Demetrius Hicks, Sr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?