Miller et al v. Samson et al
| Eric John Miller |
| Superintendent Thomas, Officer Murphy, Mark the Plumber, Sargent Samson, Sargent Nelepa, Executive Director Hickerson, Thomas Dart and Ronald F Leduora |
| 1:2013cv02830 |
| April 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Elaine E. Bucklo |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 7/10/2013:The plaintiff's motion to reconsider original complaint [# 7 -1] is denied, and the amended complaint [# 10 ] isdismissed, without prejudice. The plaintiff's motion for attorney representation [# 7 -2] is granted. The courtrequests that J. Timothy Eaton / Shefsky & Froelich, Ltd / 111 East Wacker Drive, Suite 2800 / Chicago, Illinois60601 / (312) 527-4000 represent the plaintiff in accordance with counsel's tr ial bar obligations under the DistrictCourt's Local Rule 83.37 (N.D. Ill.). Counsel is directed to file a second amended complaint within 60 days ifthe amended pleading comports with counsel's obligations under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff's motions to return original exhibits [# 9 ] and to receive confirmation of correspondences with thecourt [# 13 ] are denied as moot.Mailed notice(ao,)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
