Fridman v. NYCB Mortgage Company, LLC
Plaintiff: Elena Fridman
Defendant: NYCB Mortgage Company, LLC
Case Number: 1:2013cv03094
Filed: April 24, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Norgle
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 59 Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 5/27/2014. Mailed notice(rj, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fridman v. NYCB Mortgage Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NYCB Mortgage Company, LLC
Represented By: Michael K. Daming
Represented By: LeAnn Pedersen Pope
Represented By: Sara Youn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elena Fridman
Represented By: Cathleen M. Combs
Represented By: Catherine Anne Ceko
Represented By: Daniel A. Edelman
Represented By: James O. Latturner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?