Jefferies et al v. City Of Chicago et al
Plaintiff: Brittany Shanne Jefferies and Debra Ann Foster
Defendant: City Of Chicago and Amandla Charter HS
Case Number: 1:2013cv03427
Filed: May 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Matthew F. Kennelly
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 104 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order written by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 3/10/2016: For the reasons stated, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez's report and recommendation, grants defendants' motion to enforce the parties&# 039; settlement agreement [dkt. no. 90], and denies Foster's motion to amend and redress section 1983 claim and motion for clarity of Judge Valdez's ruling [dkt. nos. 82 & 83]. The Court also terminates Judge Valdez's R&R as a pending motion [dkt. no. 95]. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment stating as follows: (1) Defendant is directed to tender to plaintiff, within seven days of this order, a check drawn on good funds in the amount of $8,100. (2) Upon defendant's tender of that check, all claims asserted in this litigation are dismissed with prejudice, and plaintiff will be deemed to have released all of those claims. Mailed notice. (pjg, )
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 56 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order written by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 8/13/2014. The Court terminates as moot defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiffs' original complaint [docket nos. 20 & 22 ]. Plaintiff Debra Ann Foster's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [docket no. 17 ] was previously granted and is therefore terminated. Finally, for the reasons stated above, the Court grants defendants' motions to dismiss the amended complaint [docket nos. 37 & 38 ] and directs the Clerk to enter judgment dismissing plaintiff Debra Ann Foster's claims with prejudice and plaintiff Brittany Shanne Jeffries' claims without prejudice. Mailed notice.(pjg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jefferies et al v. City Of Chicago et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Shanne Jefferies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Debra Ann Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City Of Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amandla Charter HS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?