Dustman v. Huerta
Respondent: Andrew K. Dustman
Appellee: Federal Aviation Administration
Case Number: 1:2013cv03565
Filed: May 13, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Elaine E. Bucklo
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 49 U.S.C. ยง 1471 Federal Aviation Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Enter MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 10/23/2013. Mailed notice (jdh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dustman v. Huerta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Andrew K. Dustman
Represented By: Charles Rayburn Barnett, III
Represented By: Paul Robert Borth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Federal Aviation Administration
Represented By: Kurt N. Lindland
Represented By: Marcia Kay Sowles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?