Avila v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
| Daniel Avila |
| CitiMortgage, Inc. and Restore Construction, Inc. |
| 1:2013cv03566 |
| May 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Ronald A. Guzman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 4/2/2014: For the reasons set forth above, and in the Court's orders of October 2, 2013 and January 17, 2014 dismissing the prior versions of plaintiff's complaint, the Court grants defendant's motion to dismiss 75 and terminates this case. Mailed notice (cjg, )
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 10/2/2013: For the reasons set forth above, the Court denies Citi's motion to strike class allegations 19 , grants Citi's motion to dismiss 16 , dismisses with out prejudice plaintiff's breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty claims (Counts I and II) and dismisses with prejudice his conversion claim (Count III). Plaintiff has fourteen days from the date of this Order to amend Counts I and II, if he can do so and comply with Rule 11. If he fails to do so in that period, the Court will dismiss those claims and this case with prejudice. Mailed notice (cjg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
