Wright v. United States Department Of Justice et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Northern District Wright v. United States Department Of Justice et al

Wright v. United States Department Of Justice et al

Plaintiff:	Earl Lee Wright
Defendant:	United States Department Of Justice
Case Number:	1:2013cv04314
Filed:	June 11, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	XX US, Outside the State of IL
Presiding Judge:	Sharon Johnson Coleman
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 12, 2013	Filing 6 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 7/12/2013: The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [[#3]] is denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and the complaint is summarily dismissed with pr ejudice for failure of the plaintiff to advise the court that he had "struck out." The case is terminated. The plaintiff's motion for attorney representation [# 4 ] is denied as moot. Having brought this action, the plaintiff nevertheless remains obligated to pay the full filing fee. Before pursuing any future litigation, the plaintiff must pay any outstanding fees. Mailed notice. [For further details see written opinion.](ea, )

Date Filed

Document Text

July 12, 2013

Filing 6 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 7/12/2013: The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [[#3]] is denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and the complaint is summarily dismissed with pr ejudice for failure of the plaintiff to advise the court that he had "struck out." The case is terminated. The plaintiff's motion for attorney representation [# 4 ] is denied as moot. Having brought this action, the plaintiff nevertheless remains obligated to pay the full filing fee. Before pursuing any future litigation, the plaintiff must pay any outstanding fees. Mailed notice. [For further details see written opinion.](ea, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. United States Department Of Justice et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department Of Justice
Represented By:	AUSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Earl Lee Wright
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?