Induction Innovations, Inc. et al v. Pacholok
Plaintiff: Induction Innovations, Inc. and Sarge Holdings Company, LLC
Defendant: David Pacholok
Counter_claimant: David Pacholok
Counter_defendant: Induction Innovations, Inc. and Sarge Holdings Company, LLC
Third_party_defendant: Michael Mazza
Thirdparty_plaintiff: David Pacholok
Case Number: 1:2013cv05102
Filed: July 17, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Kane
Presiding Judge: James B. Zagel
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 243 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 12/31/2015: Multiple issues of fact preclude a determination that Induction has calculated properly its royalty obligations to Pacholok. Accordingly, it cannot be resolved as a matter of law that Induction owes Pacholok no royalty payments under Section 3(e) of the Stock Purchase agreement. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, 170 , is therefore denied. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (psm, )
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 155 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 9/30/2014: David Pacholok's Motion to Dismiss 144 is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is denied as it pertains to plaintiffs' request for a declarati on that no money is owed Pacholok under the Stock Purchase Agreement (Count V). The motion is granted as it pertains to all other claims in the second amended complaint, 139 , which are dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Status hearing remains set for 10/17/14 at 9:30 a.m. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed by Judicial Staff.(psm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Induction Innovations, Inc. et al v. Pacholok
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Induction Innovations, Inc.
Represented By: Dana Drexler Alvarado
Represented By: Michael P. Mazza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarge Holdings Company, LLC
Represented By: Dana Drexler Alvarado
Represented By: Michael P. Mazza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Pacholok
Represented By: Edward L. Bishop
Represented By: Benjamin Adam Campbell
Represented By: Nicholas S. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: David Pacholok
Represented By: Edward L. Bishop
Represented By: Benjamin Adam Campbell
Represented By: Nicholas S. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Induction Innovations, Inc.
Represented By: Dana Drexler Alvarado
Represented By: Michael P. Mazza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Sarge Holdings Company, LLC
Represented By: Dana Drexler Alvarado
Represented By: Michael P. Mazza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Third_party_defendant: Michael Mazza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Thirdparty_plaintiff: David Pacholok
Represented By: Edward L. Bishop
Represented By: Benjamin Adam Campbell
Represented By: Nicholas S. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?