Federal Trade Commission v. Acquinity Interactive, LLC et al
| Federal Trade Commission |
| Worldwide Commerce Associates, LLC, Revenue Path E-Consulting Private, Limited, Garry Jonas, 7657030 Canada, Inc., Acquinity Interactive, LLC, Sarita Somani, Firebrand Group, S.L., LLC, Matthew Beucler and Revenuepath Limited |
| 1:2013cv05380 |
| July 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order written by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 1/6/2014. The FTC chose this district, the home forum of its investigating office, and for that reason its choice is entitled to significant consideration. That said, the b alance of the other factors considered under section 1404(a) tilts significantly in favor of transfer. The Court concludes that transfer would not merely shift inconvenience from one side to the other and that the balance of convenience strongly favors transfer. For these reasons, the Court grants defendant's motion to transfer [dkt. no. 16] and directs the Clerk to transfer this case to the Southern District of Florida. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (pjg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
