Alanis v. Metra

Alanis v. Metra

Plaintiff:	Elda Alanis
Defendant:	Metra
Case Number:	1:2013cv05962
Filed:	August 21, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Virginia M. Kendall
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 13, 2017	Filing 64 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 2/13/2017: Metra's motion for summary judgment, 54 , is granted. Enter judgment and terminate the civil case. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed. (psm, )
February 8, 2016	Filing 44 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 2/8/2016: Defendants' motions to dismiss, 31 , is granted in part and denied in part. Count I of the current complaint is barred by res judicata and is dismissed with p rejudice. Count XI fails to state a proper claim for hostile work environment under the ADA (assuming that such a claim is actionable), and is also dismissed. Because Alanis may be able to cure some of this claim's deficiencies through re-pleading, however, it is dismissed without prejudice. The motion is otherwise denied. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (psm, )

Date Filed

Document Text

February 13, 2017

Filing 64 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 2/13/2017: Metra's motion for summary judgment, 54 , is granted. Enter judgment and terminate the civil case. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed. (psm, )

February 8, 2016

Filing 44 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 2/8/2016: Defendants' motions to dismiss, 31 , is granted in part and denied in part. Count I of the current complaint is barred by res judicata and is dismissed with p rejudice. Count XI fails to state a proper claim for hostile work environment under the ADA (assuming that such a claim is actionable), and is also dismissed. Because Alanis may be able to cure some of this claim's deficiencies through re-pleading, however, it is dismissed without prejudice. The motion is otherwise denied. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (psm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alanis v. Metra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elda Alanis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Metra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?