Miller v. Dart et al
| Aaron Miller |
| Tom Dart, Cindy Klien, Mohammed Mansur and Nurse Jefferson |
| 1:2014cv00031 |
| January 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Joan B. Gottschall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The motion to dismiss Miller's sixth amendment complaint (ECF No. 80 ) is granted in part, denied in part, and denied in part without prejudice as to Count Fifteen. Plaintiff's claims against Cook County alleged in the sixth amended complaint are dismissed. The ADA claims alleged in Count Three are dismissed as well. Because of the unusual complexities of this case, the court exercises its discretion to recruit new counsel to represent Miller wi th thanks to Mr. Tasch for his ardent efforts on Miller's behalf. A status conference is set for April 28, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. Also, to conform the docket to the live complaint, the clerk is directed to terminate the following four parties: defendant Officer Jalowski; defendant Samuel L. Clemons, Commander; defendant Cook County Department of Corrections; and defendant Tom Dart, Sheriff. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 3/10/2017. Mailed notice(vcf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
