Michalowski v. Rutherford et al
Plaintiff: Edmund Michalowski
Defendant: Dan Rutherford and Kyle Ham
Case Number: 1:2014cv00899
Filed: February 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Joan H. Lefkow
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 109 OPINION and ORDER Signed by the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 2/18/2016: Motions of defendants Ham and Conrad 89 , Rutherford 91 , and the Dan Rutherford Campaign Committee 92 are granted. Michalowski's RICO claims (counts I and II) are dismi ssed with prejudice. Plaintiff Michalowski is given until March 8, 2016 to file a Third Amended Complaint alleging only the facts that are relevant to his § 1983 claim. Status hearing and scheduling conference set for March 1, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. with a view of bringing this case to conclusion as expeditiously as is practicable.Mailed notice(mad, )
March 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 82 OPINION and ORDER Signed by the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 3/6/2015. Motions to dismiss filed by the Romney Campaign 39 ; Ham, Conrad, the State of Illinois, and the Illinois State Treasurer's Office 44 ; Rutherford 47 ; and the Rutherford C ampaign 51 are granted in part and denied in part. Michalowski's First Amendment and Title VII claims (Counts III and V) are dismissed with prejudice. Michalowski's RICO claims (Counts I and II) are dismissed without prejudice. The mot ion to dismiss Michalowski's § 1983 hostile work environment claim (Count IV) is denied. Michalowski's motion to strike 68 is granted, and Rutherford's, Ham's, and Conrad's motion for sanctions 41 is denied. This c ase is set for a status hearing on March 11, 2015 at 10:15 a.m. for plaintiff to indicate whether he intends to file amended RICO claims. Time for defendant Rutherford to answer shall be held in abeyance until the status hearing.Mailed notice(mad, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michalowski v. Rutherford et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edmund Michalowski
Represented By: Alice Christine Svenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dan Rutherford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kyle Ham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?