Battle v. Alderden et al
| Ruben Battle |
| Jacob Alderden, City of Chicago, Jamal Wright and Walgreen's Corp. |
| 1:2014cv01785 |
| March 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Ronald A. Guzman |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
143
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 9/19/17.Mailed notice(ca, )
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 12/9/15.Mailed notice(ca, )
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons provided herein, the Court grants Defendants Jacob Alderden and the City of Chicago's motion to dismiss 23 and Defendants Walgreen Co. and Jamar Wright's motion to dismiss 27 . Battle's substantive due process claim (Count I) and state law claims (Count III and IV) are dismissed with prejudice. Battle's procedural due process claim (Count I) and equal protection claim (Count II) are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Walgr een is dismissed as a defendant. Battle shall file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies outlined herein within fifteen days of the issuance of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. If Battle fails to do so, the Court will dismiss this case with the understanding that he no longer wishes to litigate this case. -Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 3/30/2015. [For further details see order.] Mailed notice (np, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
