Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Teddy O'Brians, Inc.
| Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation |
| Teddy O'Brians, Inc. |
| Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation |
| Teddy O'Brians, Inc. |
| 1:2014cv03570 |
| May 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Ronald A. Guzman |
| Maria Valdez |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 1/20/2015: For the reasons set forth above, the Court grants plaintiff's motion to dismiss Count VI of the amended counterclaim 35 , which is dismissed with prejudice. Mailed notice (cjg, )
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 9/24/2014: For the reasons set forth above, the Court grants in part and denies in part plaintiff's motion to dismiss Counts I, and III-VIII of the counterclaim 20 . The motion is granted as to Counts VIVIII and denied as to Counts I and III-V. Count VIII is dismissed with prejudice. Defendant has fourteen days from the date of this order to amend Counts VI and VII, if it can do so and comply with Rule 11. If defendant fails to file a timely amendment, the Court will dismiss Counts VI and VII with prejudice. Mailed notice (cjg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
