Stampley v. Altom Transport, Inc.

Stampley v. Altom Transport, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Michael Stampley
Defendant:	Altom Transport, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2014cv03747
Filed:	May 21, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Elaine E. Bucklo
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 15, 2016	Filing 133 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 9/15/2016: Altom's motion for summary judgment on Stampley's claims, 111 , is denied. A status hearing is set for 10/6/16 at 9:30 a.m. Notices mailed by Judicial Staff.(psm, )
September 24, 2015	Filing 100 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 9/24/2015: Plaintiff's motion for class certification 50 is granted in part and denied in part. The court certifies a class defined as follows: All equipment owner-op erators in the United States who, during the period from June 15, 2010 to the present, had or have owner-operator agreements that identify Altom Transport, Inc. as the carrier, hauled shipments pursuant to such agreements for which Altom collected pa yment for tank washes, and who did not object within 30 days of payment for such hauls to the exclusion of the tank-wash funds from "gross." Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 33 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to strike 93 is denied. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (psm, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 15, 2016

Filing 133 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 9/15/2016: Altom's motion for summary judgment on Stampley's claims, 111 , is denied. A status hearing is set for 10/6/16 at 9:30 a.m. Notices mailed by Judicial Staff.(psm, )

September 24, 2015

Filing 100 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 9/24/2015: Plaintiff's motion for class certification 50 is granted in part and denied in part. The court certifies a class defined as follows: All equipment owner-op erators in the United States who, during the period from June 15, 2010 to the present, had or have owner-operator agreements that identify Altom Transport, Inc. as the carrier, hauled shipments pursuant to such agreements for which Altom collected pa yment for tank washes, and who did not object within 30 days of payment for such hauls to the exclusion of the tank-wash funds from "gross." Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 33 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to strike 93 is denied. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (psm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stampley v. Altom Transport, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Stampley
Represented By:	Marvin Alan Miller
Represented By:	Andrew Szot
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Altom Transport, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?