Amin v. SunTrust Bank et al
| Chirag Amin |
| United Parcel Service, Inc., National Arbitration Forum, Associated Bank, Western Union, Renell Lewis, Catholic University of America, SunTrust Bank, Chicago Sun-Times, Google, Inc., ABB, Ltd. and Taylor Mark |
| 1:2014cv03903 |
| May 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Winnebago |
| Thomas M. Durkin |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order:The case was dismissed and judgment entered on July 11, 2014. Any disagreement with the action must be done, if timely, through an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, as there is presently no case before this Court. To the extent the Plaintiff's affidavit is considered a motion for recusal, it is denied as moot. 7 Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 7/24/2014:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Amin's federal claims in Counts I, II, III, and IV are dismissed with prejudice. Amin's state law claims in Counts V, VI, VII, and VIII are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdictions. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 4 is denied as moot. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 7/11/2014:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
