Nutall v. Reserve Marine Terminals

Nutall v. Reserve Marine Terminals

Plaintiff:	Ivory Nutall
Defendant:	Reserve Marine Terminals
Case Number:	1:2014cv04738
Filed:	June 24, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Marvin E. Aspen
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 621
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 28, 2016	Filing 95 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 6/28/2016: For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion and Order, Defendant's motion in limine regarding emotional distress or damages relating to Plaintiff's i njury and rehabilitation, Defendant's motion concerning the size and location of defense counsel's firm, and Defendant's motion relating to Defendant's status as an out-of-state or foreign corporation granted. Defendant's mo tions concerning Dr. Singh's testimony, Dr. Singh's resume or CV, Plaintiff's personal belief that he can lift 70 pounds, and Defendants motion concerning Plaintiff's missing tools denied. By July 15, 2016, Plaintiff shall submit an expert disclosure for Dr. Singh pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 26(a)(2)(C) or Plaintiff shall be barred from presenting testimony pursuant to Rule 702. By the same date, Plaintiff also shall identify the specific documents within his medical files that he intends to offer at trial along with grounds for each documents admissibility. The trial date of July 18, 2016 is vacated. The status date of June 30, 2016 to report on settlement remains at which time a new trial date will be set if need be.Mailed notice(mad, )
December 22, 2015	Filing 70 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated, we deny Defendant's motion for summary judgement as to Plaintiff's claims for disability discrimination under both the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Illinois Human Rights Act along with Plaintiffs claim for retaliatory failure to recall under Illinois common law. We grant Defendants motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's claims for age discrimination under both state and federal law. It is so ordered. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 12/22/2015. Mailed notice. (mgh, )

Date Filed

Document Text

June 28, 2016

Filing 95 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 6/28/2016: For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion and Order, Defendant's motion in limine regarding emotional distress or damages relating to Plaintiff's i njury and rehabilitation, Defendant's motion concerning the size and location of defense counsel's firm, and Defendant's motion relating to Defendant's status as an out-of-state or foreign corporation granted. Defendant's mo tions concerning Dr. Singh's testimony, Dr. Singh's resume or CV, Plaintiff's personal belief that he can lift 70 pounds, and Defendants motion concerning Plaintiff's missing tools denied. By July 15, 2016, Plaintiff shall submit an expert disclosure for Dr. Singh pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 26(a)(2)(C) or Plaintiff shall be barred from presenting testimony pursuant to Rule 702. By the same date, Plaintiff also shall identify the specific documents within his medical files that he intends to offer at trial along with grounds for each documents admissibility. The trial date of July 18, 2016 is vacated. The status date of June 30, 2016 to report on settlement remains at which time a new trial date will be set if need be.Mailed notice(mad, )

December 22, 2015

Filing 70 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated, we deny Defendant's motion for summary judgement as to Plaintiff's claims for disability discrimination under both the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Illinois Human Rights Act along with Plaintiffs claim for retaliatory failure to recall under Illinois common law. We grant Defendants motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's claims for age discrimination under both state and federal law. It is so ordered. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 12/22/2015. Mailed notice. (mgh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nutall v. Reserve Marine Terminals
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ivory Nutall
Represented By:	Julie Owen Herrera
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Reserve Marine Terminals
Represented By:	Kaitlyn N. Jakubowski
Represented By:	David Brian Ritter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?