Gunty v. Exelon Corporation et al
| Beth Gunty |
| Exelon Corporation, Exelon Generation, Exelon Nuclear and Exelon Nuclear Security |
| 1:2014cv04756 |
| June 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Marvin E. Aspen |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the case caption to 1) add "LLC" to the name of defendant Exelon Nuclear Security and 2) label Optum Inc. as a "Third Party" instead of a "Third Party Defe ndant." Defendant Exelon Nuclear Security, LLC's motion for summary judgment 49 is granted. Judgment will be entered in favor of Exelon Nuclear Security, LLC and against plaintiff. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 4/18/2017 Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. We grant Moving Defendants' partial motion to dismiss 9 Exelon Corporation and Exelon Generation Company as parties to this litigation. Additionally, Exelon Nuclear is stricken from the complaint. Plaintiff may proceed with her employment discrimination claims against Defendant Exelon Nuclear Security. It is so ordered. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 11/4/2014. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
