Lacy v. Dart et al
Johnathan Lacy, Kenneth Farris, Marquis Bowers and Maurice Boston |
Thomas Dart, Cook County, Illinois, Sgt. Johnson, Correctional Officer Nawara, Correctional Officer Lopez and Correctional Officer Wilson |
1:2014cv06259 |
August 14, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Robert W. Gettleman |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 337 MOTION by Defendants Cook County, Illinois, Thomas Dart for judgment as a Matter of Law (Cummings, Nicholas) |
Filing 218 Memorandum Opinion and order signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 11/19/2015: Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment 164 is granted; Defendants' motion to strike 178 is denied. Defendants' motion for summary judgment 183 is denied. Mailed notice (gds) |
Filing 203 Memorandum Opinion and order signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 10/8/2015: Plaintiffs' request for a declaratory judgment is denied. Motion for preliminary injunction 18 is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' report is due by 10/29/2015. Plaintiffs' response is due by 11/12/2015. Status hearing is set for 11/18/2015 at 10:00 a.m. Mailed notice (gds) |
Filing 142 Motion to certify class 76 is granted; Memorandum Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 4/30/2015: Plaintiffs' motion 76 to certify class is granted. Mailed notice (gds) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.