Barnett v. Smith and Nephew, Inc. et al
Plaintiff:
Harvey J Barnett
Defendant:
Smith and Nephew, Inc.
Case Number:
1:2014cv06307
Filed:
August 15, 2014
Court:
Illinois Northern District Court
Office:
Chicago Office
County:
Lake
Presiding Judge:
Milton I. Shadur
Nature of Suit:
Other
Cause of Action:
28:1441
Jury Demanded By:
Both
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
March 11, 2015 | 25 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Barnett v. Smith and Nephew, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Smith and Nephew, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Anthony Nicholas Bartosik |
Represented By: | Anthony Joseph Monaco |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Harvey J Barnett | |
Represented By: | Peter J. Flowers |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.