Preferred Capital Lending, Inc. et al v. Chakwin, Jr. et al
| Preferred Capital Lending Inc and Preferred Capital Lending of Nevada, LLC |
| Stephen D. Chakwin, Jr. |
| 1:2014cv07409 |
| September 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Ronald A. Guzman |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: As set forth below, Preferred Capital's motion for summary judgment 26 is granted in part and Chakwin's cross-motion for summary judgment 31 is granted in part. Status is set for November 4, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in order to set a trial date on the issue of whether the violation of the Illinois Interest Act was intentional. The parties are directed to meet and confer regarding (1) the relief, if any, Chakwin is entitled to in the event of a finding tha t the violation was unintentional; and (2) the status of Preferred Capital's remaining claims of breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and special damages. The parties shall then each file a statement no later than October 26, 2015 indicating their responses to these two issues. In the event the parties agree on these issues, they may file a joint statement. Signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 10/7/2015. Mailed notice (aee, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
