Portalatin v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC et al
Plaintiff: Iwona Portalatin
Defendant: Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC and Midland Funding, LLC
Case Number: 1:2014cv08271
Filed: October 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Matthew F. Kennelly
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 152 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 10/25/2017: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court grants plaintiff's petition for attorney's fees and costs [dkt. no. 131] and awards plaintiff attorney's fees in the amount of $69,393.75 ($55,687.50 for Badwan and $13,706.25 for Wooten) and costs in the amount of $772.95. The status hearing set for 10/26/2017 is vacated. (mk)
February 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 113 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 2/20/2016: For the reasons stated in the accompanying decision, the Court denies Blatt's motion to alter or amend the judgment, or in the alternative for relief from ju dgment [dkt. no. 105]. The ruling date of February 29, 2016 is vacated. The case is set for a status hearing on that same date, at 8:30 a.m. in chambers (Room 2188), to discuss a schedule for briefing plaintiff's anticipated petition for attorney's fees. (mk)
August 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 67 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 8/28/2015: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court denies defendant's motion for summary judgment [dkt. no. 48]; grants plain tiff's motion for summary judgment [dkt no. 53] with regard to defendant's affirmative defenses based on 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(c) and 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(e); and otherwise denies plaintiff's motion. The case is set for a status hearing on September 16, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. for the purpose of setting a prompt trial date and discussing the possibility of settlement. (mk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Portalatin v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Iwona Portalatin
Represented By: Mohammed Omar Badwan
Represented By: Daniel John McGarry
Represented By: Ahmad Tayseer Sulaiman, First
Represented By: Nathan Charles Volheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Funding, LLC
Represented By: David M Schultz
Represented By: Katherine Hannah Tresley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?