Epstein v. Epstein et al
Barry Epstein |
Paula Epstein and Jay Frank |
1:2014cv08431 |
October 27, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Thomas M. Durkin |
Other Statutory Actions |
18 U.S.C. ยง 2518 Interception of Wire/Oral/Electronic Communication |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 301 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 7/26/2017:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Filing 231 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendant's motion to strike jury demand 184 is granted. Status hearing held on 6/27/2017. Defendant's response to plaintiff's motion to continue the trial date 219 is due by 7/5/2017. Status hearing set for 7/6/2017 at 09:00 AM. On the Court's own motion the bench trial is reset for 7/31/2017 at 09:30 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 6/27/2017:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants defendants motions to dismiss, R. 17 and 23 . The Court dismisses Counts I, II, III, and IV of plaintiffs First Amended Complaint with prejudice. The Court declines to exer cise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs intrusion-upon-seclusion claim (Count V) and dismisses it without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Defendant Epstein's motion to dismiss 14 is denied as moot. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 4/20/2015:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.