Peterson et al v. Downers Grove, The Village of
Plaintiff: Robert Peterson and Leibundguth Moving & Storage, Inc.
Defendant: Downers Grove, The Village of
Case Number: 1:2014cv09851
Filed: December 8, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Du Page
Presiding Judge: Edmond E. Chang
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 74 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Plaintiffs' motion to alter judgment 63 is denied. The Court will enter, however, an amended judgment to reflect that Leibundguth 9;s challenge to Section 9.050(C)(5)s size restriction is not moot for Article III purposes, but that its claim is still dismissed for the same reasons Leibundguth's challenge to the other size restriction in § 9.050(A) was dismissed.Emailed notice(slb, )
February 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 67 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Plaintiffs' motion to stay 54 is denied and the Court relinquishes jurisdiction over Downers Grove's state-law counterclaim, which is dismissed without prejudice. A separate AO-450 judgment shall be entered. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice(slb, )
December 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Defendant's motion for summary judgment 35 is granted and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 39 is denied. A separate AO- 450 shall be entered. As explained in the conclusion of the Opinion, a temporary stay of the judgment is entered until 12/28/2015, in order to allow the parties to confer on a possible agreement about fines pending appeal, or absent that, for Plaintiffs to file a motion for stay pending appeal. The status hearing of 12/17/2015 is reset to 01/07/2016 at 10:00 a.m.Emailed notice(slb, )
April 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Defendant's motion to dismiss 13 is denied. Emailed notice(slb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterson et al v. Downers Grove, The Village of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Peterson
Represented By: Jacob Horst Huebert
Represented By: Jeffrey M. Schwab
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leibundguth Moving & Storage, Inc.
Represented By: Jacob Horst Huebert
Represented By: Jeffrey M. Schwab
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Downers Grove, The Village of
Represented By: Scott M. Day
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?