Klingler v. City Of Chicago et al
Whitley Klingler |
City Of Chicago, Mayasol, LLC, d/b/a McDonald's, Officer Maas, John E. Callaghan and Sean Odublan |
1:2015cv01609 |
February 21, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Thomas M. Durkin |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 187 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. For the reasons stated, defendant Will County's motion for summary judgment 166 is granted. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/20/2017:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Filing 170 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order:For the foregoing reasons, the City's motion to dismiss 141 , is granted as to Count III and denied as to its remaining parts. Defendant Griebel's motion to compel 130 is denied as moot. Plaintiff's moti on to quash 154 is denied, see this Court's 7/26/2017 order. Status hearing held on 8/8/2017. Plaintiff's response to defendant Will County's motion for summary judgment 166 is due by 9/22/2017. Defendant's reply is due 10/6/2017. A status hearing set for 10/20/2017 at 09:00 AM. The 9/5/2017 status date is vacated. Plaintiff is to respond to outstanding discovery requests by 8/14/2017. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 8/8/2017:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Filing 129 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order.The City of Chicago Defendants' motion to dismiss, R. 90 , is granted in part and denied in part; (2) Defendant Griebel's motion to dismiss, R. 98 , is denied; and (3) the motion to dismiss filed by Will Count y and Will County Sheriff Paul Kaupas, R. 100 , is granted in part and denied in part, as follows: The claims against Will County in Counts VI, VII, and IX of the First Amended Complaint are dismissed with prejudice. Sheriff Kaupas is substituted in his official capacity in the place of Will County in Counts VI and VII of the First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's Monell claims against Will County Sheriff Kaupas and the City of Chicago in Counts IX and X of the First Amended Complaint are di smissed without prejudice. In all other respects, Defendants' motions to dismiss are denied.Plaintiff may file a motion to amend her Monell claims if she does so on or before March 15, 2017. The motion should attach a proposed amendment and a br ief of no more than five pages explaining how the proposed amendment cures the deficiencies in the current Monell claims. Defendants should not file a brief responding to Plaintiff's motion to amend (should she choose to file one) unless the Court requests a response. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 2/24/2017:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.