Wu et al v. Prudential Financial, Inc. et al
| Michael H. Wu and Christine T. Wu |
| Prudential Financial, Inc., John Robert Strangfeld, Jr., Mark Brown Grier, Richard J. Carbone, Pruco Life Insurance Company, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., John P. Havens, LSV Asset Management, Marsico Capital Management LLC, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and William Blair & Company LLC |
| 1:2015cv02238 |
| March 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Milton I. Shadur |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM Order: Plaintiffs' motion to consolidate was filed in Case No. 14 C 5392. Plaintiffs' motion to consolidate Case No. 14 C 5392 and Case No. 15 C 2238 is denied. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 8/18/2015:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
|
Filing
68
Supplement to MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order dated 7/29/2015. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 7/29/2015:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM Order: With Michael and Christine Wu having finally retained counsel after this Court's repeated urging that they do so rather than trying to go it alone in this complex litigation, this Court's docket review has revealed that at torney Andrew May filed a proposed Amended Complaint in each of these cases on July 20 without complying with this District Court's LR 5.2(f) requirement that paper copies of all filings be delivered to this Court's chambers within one work ing day. Although this Court never issues this type of memorandum order without allowing appropriate flexibility as to the timing of that required delivery, in this instance -- with a preset status hearing having been scheduled for July 29 -- counsel 's several days' delinquency in compliance is simply not excusable. Accordingly attorney May is ordered: 1. to deliver a paper copy of the new filing in each of the two cases to this Court's chambers forthwith -- not later than Monday, July 27; and 2. to accompany that delivery with a check for $200 payable to the Clerk of Court as a fine for counsel's noncompliance, with no reimbursement to be sought from the clients. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 7/24/2015:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM Order: This memorandum order is being entered now so that Wus' new counsel has the maximum possible time available to be responsive to the consideration outlined here. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 6/19/2015:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 5/20/2015: This case is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of all defendants and against plaintiffs. Status hearing set for 6/8/2015 is vacated. All pending motions are terminated.Mailed notice(clw, )
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: This Court orders the parties to come prepared to discuss, at the rescheduled May 18 presentment date for the Prudential Defendants' motion, whether the earlier case calls for a reconversion to a with-prejudice dismissal (including the question whether there is jurisdiction to do so), so that the current action would be barred on claim preclusion grounds. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 5/4/2015:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Initial status hearing is set for 9:00 a.m. June 8, 2015. (For further details see Memorandum Opinion and Order) Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 3/23/2015:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
