Ploss v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Harry Ploss
Defendant: Kraft Foods Group, Inc. and Mondelez Global LLC
Case Number: 1:2015cv02937
Filed: April 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: XX US, Outside the State of IL
Presiding Judge: Edmond E. Chang
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 561 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 10/28/2022. Mailed notice(ef, )
January 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 332 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 1/3/2020: For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Plaintiffs' motion to certify the proposed class 228 is granted; and the defense's motion to strike 319 is denied without prejudice. The status hearing of 01/23/2020 remains in place. In addition to the conferral on Notice as explained in the Opinion, the parties must initiate settlement discussions as well.Emailed notice(eec)
June 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 113 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Kraft's motion to dismiss [R. 76] the Consolidated Class Action Complaint is denied as to Count One (Section 9(a)(2) long wheat futures manipulation); Count Two (Section 6(c)(1) long wheat futures manipulation); Count Three (principal-agent liability for long wheat futures manipulation); Count Six (Sherman Act claim); and Count Seven (unjust enrichment). The Court grants Kraft' s motion as to Count Four (Section 9(a)(2) EFP wash trading manipulation) and Count Five (Section 6(c)(1) EFP wash trading manipulation), but these claims are denied without prejudice. Ploss may seek leave to amend the Complaint for Counts Four and F ive. Kraft must answer the Complaint and its surviving counts by 07/18/2016. The parties shall issue their first-round of written discovery requests no later than 07/22/ 2016. At the 07/14/2016 status hearing, the Court will set the remainder of the discovery schedule. Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 6/27/2016:Emailed notice(slb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ploss v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harry Ploss
Represented By: Marvin Alan Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kraft Foods Group, Inc.
Represented By: Nicole Amie Allen
Represented By: J. Kevin McCall
Represented By: Dean Nicholas Panos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mondelez Global LLC
Represented By: Nicole Amie Allen
Represented By: J. Kevin McCall
Represented By: Dean Nicholas Panos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?